Teaching Case - Listening to the City: Rebuilding at New York's World Trade Center Site (Epilogue)

Listening to the City: Rebuilding at New York's World Trade Center Site (Epilogue)


Educator Access
A review copy of this case is available free of charge to educators and trainers. Please create an account or sign in to gain access to this material.

Permission to Reprint
Each purchase of this product entitles the buyer to one digital file and use. If you intend to distribute, teach, or share this item, you must purchase permission for each individual who will be given access. Learn more about purchasing permission to reprint.

  • Product Description

    In the wake of the terrorist destruction of the twin towers of New York's World Trade Center on September 11, 2001, city officials--even as rescue and recovery operations continued--also set in motion a process to plan what might be built on the 16-acre site at the tip of Lower Manhattan. In the months that followed, this planning process came to include not only government agencies and those with property rights to the site but a wide array of community participants, invited to register their views through advisory committees, public hearings, and an innovative computer-enhanced town meeting, at which thousands of New Yorkers would evaluate specific architectural proposals. This case tells the story of the steps taken to include and weigh the views of citizens as to the future of a site laden with meaning for the city and the world. It recounts the wide array of interests and values--from the aesthetic to the financial--which come into conflict as the question of what sorts of buildings should rise where the Twin Towers had fallen. The case covers the first period of public debate and culminates with what amounts to a citizen veto exercised over proposed plans-an outpouring of criticism that leads to the adoption of daring new proposals in early 2003. In addition to recounting details of an important part of the immediate post-9/11 history, the case is meant as a vehicle for discussing the role of citizen participation and opinion, as balanced against other interests, in a democratic planning process.

  • Other Details

    Publication Date: April 01, 2003
    HKS Case Number: 1687.1
    Case Author: Susan Rosegrant
    Faculty Lead: Archon Fung
    Pages (incl. exhibits): 3
    Setting: United States
    Language: English
    Funding Source: William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, Center for Ethics and the Professions
    _year: 2000-2009
    _pages: 1-15
    _geography: US & Canada
  • Warranty Information