Case #2124.0

A Cascade of Emergencies (A): Responding to Superstorm Sandy in New York City

Publication Date: June 30, 2018
Current Stock:

Educator Access

A review copy of this case is available free of charge to educators and trainers. Please create an account or sign in to gain access to this material.

Permission to Reprint

Each purchase of this product entitles the buyer to one digital file and use. If you intend to distribute, teach, or share this item, you must purchase permission for each individual who will be given access. Learn more about purchasing permission to reprint.

On October 29, 2012, Superstorm Sandy made landfall near Atlantic City, New Jersey. Sandy’s massive size, coupled with an unusual combination of meteorological conditions, fueled an especially powerful and destructive storm surge, which caused unprecedented damage in and around New York City, the country’s most populous metropolitan area, as well as on Long Island and along the Jersey Shore. This two-part case study focuses on how New York City prepared for the storm’s arrival and then responded to the cascading series of emergencies – from fires, to flooding, to power failures – that played out as it bore down on the city. Profiling actions taken at the local level by emergency response agencies like the New York City Fire Department (FDNY), the case also explores how the city coordinated with state and federal partners – including both the state National Guard and federal military components – and illustrates both the advantages and complications of using military assets for domestic emergency response operations.

Part B of the case highlights, among other things, the experience of Staten Island, which experienced the worst of Sandy’s wrath. In the storm’s wake, frustration over the speed of the response triggered withering public criticism from borough officials, leading to concerns that a political crisis was about to overwhelm the still unfolding relief effort.

Learning Objective

This case prompts readers to reflect on the difficulties a metropolitan area may face when confronted by multiple emergencies unfolding simultaneously in all corners of a jurisdiction. In addition, it raises questions about the use of federal military assets in domestic emergency response operations, highlights the advantages and limitations of decentralized response by both professional responders and civilians, and demonstrates the political stakes associated with a major disaster like Sandy.

Other Details

Case Author:
David W. Giles
Faculty Lead:
Arnold M. Howitt
Pages (incl. exhibits):
United States
Funding Source:
National Guard Bureau, United States Department of Defense, through the Homeland Security Institute, an initiative of the Chief, National Guard Bureau