Case #1718.0

A Virtual Defeat? Stalling the Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI)

Publication Date: January 01, 2003
Current Stock:

Educator Access

A review copy of this case is available free of charge to educators and trainers. Please create an account or sign in to gain access to this material.

Permission to Reprint

Each purchase of this product entitles the buyer to one digital file and use. If you intend to distribute, teach, or share this item, you must purchase permission for each individual who will be given access. Learn more about purchasing permission to reprint.

Negotiations for the Multilateral Agreement on Investment (MAI) began in 1993, at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Despite initial expectations, the talks failed to produce an agreement. The MAI negotiations were undercut by 600 organizations in 70 countries, all expressing vehement disapproval of the proposed treaty. While this well-organized campaign played a role in the demise of the MAI effort, it was only part of the story. Many observers attribute the failure to difficulties that arose during the talks. Negotiators had substantive disagreements about what the treaty should achieve, and their governments were often unready or unable to make the necessary commitments.

Learning Objective:
This case prompts a number of questions: How, and why, did this negotiation unfold at the OECD? Who gains and loses from foreign direct investment? What impact does international investment have on developing countries? Should international trade agreements cover foreign direct investment? Are investment agreements even necessary?

Other Details

Case Author:
Charan Devereaux
Faculty Lead:
Robert Lawrence and Michael Watkins
Pages (incl. exhibits):
United States