Case #970.0

Constructive Engagement in South Africa: The Ethics of Persuasion

Publication Date: January 01, 1990
$3.95
Current Stock:

Educator Access

A review copy of this case is available free of charge to educators and trainers. Please create an account or sign in to gain access to this material.

Permission to Reprint

Each purchase of this product entitles the buyer to one digital file and use. If you intend to distribute, teach, or share this item, you must purchase permission for each individual who will be given access. Learn more about purchasing permission to reprint.

Abstract:
This case joins the debate surrounding the approach of constructive engagement, placing it in the context of South Africa itself and presenting the moral justification for the policy as put forward both by President Reagan and Assistant Secretary of State for South Africa Chester Crocker. At issue is the question of whether quiet diplomacy undertaken in the name of incremental change and the avoidance of bloodshed operate, instead, as a tacit endorsement of a repressive regime which will then lack motivation to change. These two conflicting views collide in debate over whether the United States should impose economic sanctions on South Africa.

Learning Objective:
The case recounts both competing views about constructive engagement and the efficacy of economic sanctions, as well as describing events in South Africa as they unfold during increasingly intense US debate. The case stops short of the election of the deKlerk government and the subsequent change in course of the South Africa ruling National Party.

Other Details

Case Author:
David Fairman
Pages (incl. exhibits):
7
Setting:
Africa, South Africa
Language:
English