Video-Based Case - Nuclear Power & the Language of Diplomacy:  Negotiating a Game-Changing Nuclear Trade Agreement with India

Nuclear Power & the Language of Diplomacy: Negotiating a Game-Changing Nuclear Trade Agreement with India

×
×
Price:
$3.95

Educator Access
A review copy of this case is available free of charge to educators and trainers. Please create an account or sign in to gain access to this material.

Permission to Reprint
Each purchase of this product entitles the buyer to one digital file and use. If you intend to distribute, teach, or share this item, you must purchase permission for each individual who will be given access. Learn more about purchasing permission to reprint.

  • Product Description

    Abstract:
    This decision-forcing case focuses on a diplomatic challenge faced by US Undersecretary of State for Political Affairs Nicholas Burns and Indian Foreign Secretary Shyam Saran between April and July 2005: the writing of a 400-word joint statement and framework agreement that—if they were successful--would be the first step in a very complex negotiation between the United States and India to establish a civil nuclear trade pact. The bulk of the case consists of background material, explaining why the Bush Administration favored the negotiation of such a pact, though it reversed 30 years of US foreign policy with respect to nuclear weapons proliferation. It summarizes several important topics, crucial to understanding the issues involved in the negotiation of the joint statement: the history of US-Indian relations, India's history with respect to nuclear weapons, and issues in the international nuclear non-proliferation agreements. It gives an example of the kind of word-smithing Burns and Saran would have to engage in, to complete the joint statement. And it explains, in brief, five areas of particular difficulty that the two diplomats would have to address in some fashion. A brief sequel describes an 11th hour crisis in the negotiation and its resolution, provides the text of the final joint agreement, and very briefly summarizes the final outcome of the three-year negotiation that followed.

    Learning Objective:
    This case can be used for students of negotiation or diplomacy to think about how the United States and India might navigate the first stage of a delicate negotiation. Part of the challenge was to come up with language that finessed certain areas of discord well enough to allow the full negotiation to proceed. The case allows students to consider how they might approach this task with five tricky topics. Students will be able to read the final, actual text of the agreement.

  • Other Details

    Publication Date: June 18, 2014
    HKS Case Number: 2023.0
    Case Author: Pamela Varley
    Video Producer: Patricia Garcia-Rios
    Faculty Lead: R. Nicholas Burns
    Pages (incl. exhibits): 13
    Setting: India
    Language: English
    _year: 2010-2015
    _pages: 1-15
    _video: Yes
    _geography: Asia
  • Warranty Information

    /review/2023.0.EducatorCopy.pdf

×
×